InterpersonalABUSE TACTIC
Reproductive Coercion
What it is
Behavior by a partner that controls a person's reproductive choices — pressure or threats to become pregnant or to end or continue a pregnancy, sabotage of contraception, and non-consensual condom removal — recognized since Miller and colleagues' 2010 study as a distinct form of intimate-partner abuse.
How it works
Real-world examples
- •Miller et al. (2010): among young women attending family-planning clinics in Northern California, pregnancy coercion and birth-control sabotage were common and were associated with substantially higher odds of unintended pregnancy, particularly where partner violence was also present.
- •Brodsky (2017) documented non-consensual condom removal and argued for a legal response; in 2021 California created a civil cause of action for it, the first US state to do so.
- •ACOG Committee Opinion 554 (2013) describes reproductive and sexual coercion for clinicians and recommends screening, noting that repeat unintended pregnancy and repeated emergency-contraception requests are the presenting signs.
- •In coercive-control cases described by Stark (2007), pregnancy was used to end a partner's education or employment, and threats about custody then kept her from leaving — reproduction as an exit cost.
Ethical guidelines
- ●This technique is inherently unethical and psychologically harmful. Never use it in any context. If you recognize yourself doing this, seek professional help.
- ●Decisions about pregnancy belong to the person whose body is involved; a partner's wishes are legitimately expressed as wishes, never as sabotage, threats, or deception.
- ●Removing a condom without consent turns consensual sex into non-consensual sex; several jurisdictions now treat it as assault or as a civil wrong.
- ●Clinicians who see repeat unintended pregnancy or repeat emergency-contraception requests should ask about coercion privately; the patient will rarely raise it unprompted.
How to defend against it
- ►Name the behavior to yourself: pressure, sabotage, or deception around contraception or pregnancy is abuse, not a disagreement about family planning, and it predicts other abuse.
- ►Talk to a clinician alone. Family-planning clinics screen for coercion and can discuss contraceptive options that do not depend on a partner's cooperation or knowledge; ask for the conversation without your partner present, which clinics will arrange as a matter of routine.
- ►Contact a domestic-violence advocate (US: 1-800-799-7233, text START to 88788, thehotline.org; for young people, loveisrespect.org, 1-866-331-9474; other countries: the NO MORE Global Directory, nomoredirectory.org). Reproductive coercion is on their screening lists and usually travels with other control, so they will help you assess danger and plan. Do not confront the partner about the sabotage without that plan; confrontation can escalate risk.
- ►Where the coercion concerns a pregnancy already begun, the decision remains yours in law in most places; a clinician or advocate can connect you with legal help if a partner is using threats, immigration status, or money to force an outcome.
- ►Keep any evidence — damaged contraception, messages, threats — somewhere the partner cannot access. If you are in immediate danger, your safety comes before documentation.
From the Defense Playbook
Every playbook entry states how strong its evidence is and when not to use it. Browse the full playbook.
References
- Miller, E., Decker, M. R., McCauley, H. L., Tancredi, D. J., Levenson, R. R., Waldman, J., Schoenwald, P., & Silverman, J. G. (2010). Pregnancy Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence and Unintended Pregnancy. Contraception, 81(4), 316-322The naming of reproductive coercion, its prevalence among clinic attendees (approximately one in five for pregnancy coercion), and its association with partner violence and unintended pregnancy.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2013). Committee Opinion No. 554: Reproductive and Sexual Coercion. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 121(2), 411-415Clinical description of the behaviors, presenting signs, and the recommendation to screen.
- Brodsky, A. (2017). “Rape-Adjacent”: Imagining Legal Responses to Nonconsensual Condom Removal. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 32(2)Documentation of non-consensual condom removal and the case for legal remedies.
Last reviewed
Suggest a correction