Legal & DebateNEUTRAL — Rhetoric

PEACE Model of Investigative Interviewing

What it is

The information-gathering interview framework adopted in England and Wales in 1992 (Planning and preparation, Engage and explain, Account, Closure, Evaluate), built on open questioning and rapport rather than accusation and pressure, and now the reference model for ethical interviewing.

How it works

PEACE was developed after the Guildford Four and Birmingham Six cases exposed convictions built on coerced confessions; the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 had already required interviews to be recorded, and the recordings showed how poor much interviewing was. The model separates gathering an account from testing it. The interviewer plans, explains the process, invites a free narrative with open prompts and minimal interruption, then probes with specific questions and, only after the account is complete, puts inconsistencies and evidence to the interviewee. Techniques from the cognitive interview (context reinstatement, reporting everything, recalling in different orders) increase the quantity and accuracy of recall. The persuasion lever is rapport and the interviewee's own wish to be understood, not fear; the model treats a confession as one possible outcome rather than the goal. Meissner and colleagues' 2014 meta-analysis found that information-gathering methods produced true confessions at rates comparable to accusatorial methods with fewer false confessions, and Clarke and Milne's 2001 national evaluation found improved interviewing but uneven adherence, which led to tiered training.

Real-world examples

  • •The Guildford Four (convictions quashed 1989) and Birmingham Six (1991) cases, in which confessions were obtained by violence and threats, discredited confession-driven interrogation in the UK and produced the reforms that PEACE embodies.
  • •Norway adopted an investigative-interviewing program in the early 2000s after a high-profile false-confession case, and its architects have since promoted the approach to police services internationally.
  • •The 2021 Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations and Information Gathering (the Mendez Principles), developed under the former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, take the PEACE approach as their model and reject confession-driven interrogation.
  • •Meissner and colleagues (2014) pooled laboratory and field studies and found that information-gathering interviews elicited true confessions at comparable or higher rates than accusatorial interrogation while producing fewer false ones.

Ethical guidelines

  • ●PEACE is the reference point for ethical interviewing precisely because it forbids the levers the accusatory model relies on: deception about evidence, minimization that implies leniency, and refusal to accept denials.
  • ●Rapport is a technique, and interviewees should understand that a friendly interviewer is still an investigator; the model requires the interviewer to explain the purpose of the interview and the person's rights at the outset.
  • ●The model applies to witnesses and victims as well as suspects; open questioning and minimal suggestion protect the accuracy of every account.
  • ●Educational; rules vary by jurisdiction; not legal advice.

How to defend against it

  • ►Interviewees: the rights to counsel and to silence apply in a PEACE interview as in any other; rapport does not change the legal stakes, and a lawyer present is not a sign of guilt.
  • ►Jurors: when evaluating an interview, look for the structure: was a free account taken before any challenge, were the questions open, was the recording complete? An account gathered this way deserves more weight than one shaped by leading questions.
  • ►Opposing advocates: use the recording. Interviews that depart from the model (interruption, suggestion, challenge before account) are the material for cross-examination of the investigator and for suppression arguments.
  • ►Organizations conducting internal investigations: adopt the model; it produces more accurate information, survives later scrutiny, and is the standard against which coercive workplace interviews are increasingly judged.

References

  1. Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). National Evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course. Police Research Award Scheme Report No. PRAS/149, UK Home Office
    Evaluation of PEACE adoption in England and Wales: improved interviewing with uneven adherence to the model.
  2. Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Michael, S. W., Evans, J. R., Camilletti, C. R., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 459-486
    Information-gathering methods produce comparable true confessions and fewer false confessions than accusatorial methods.
  3. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Charles C Thomas
    The cognitive interview techniques (context reinstatement, report everything, varied retrieval) incorporated into the Account phase.
  4. Association for the Prevention of Torture, Anti-Torture Initiative, & Norwegian Centre for Human Rights (2021). Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations and Information Gathering (the Mendez Principles). Published jointly by the three organizations
    International standard endorsing rapport-based, non-coercive interviewing and rejecting confession-driven interrogation.
Last reviewed
Suggest a correction

Detect PEACE Model of Investigative Interviewing in any text

Paste any message, email, or article into our free Manipulation Detector to see if PEACE Model of Investigative Interviewing or other techniques are being used on you.

Try the Detector FreeCreate Free Account