DigitalMANIPULATIVE

Trading Up the Chain

What it is

Moving a story from low-credibility venues to progressively more reputable ones, each outlet citing the last, until a claim that could never have been published directly appears in mainstream news.

How it works

Outlets differ in their verification thresholds, and each sits in a food chain of aggregation: small blogs and forums feed partisan sites, which feed talk radio, cable, and tabloids, which feed wire services and papers of record. Ryan Holiday (2012) described exploiting this as a publicist — plant a story where the bar is lowest, then pitch the next tier with the first tier's coverage as proof that the story exists. Marwick and Lewis (2017) documented the same ladder used by political subcultures: a rumor originates on an anonymous board, gets a write-up on a hyper-partisan site, becomes a segment on a sympathetic show, and is then covered by mainstream outlets as a controversy people are discussing. The lever is that each outlet verifies existence rather than truth; the fact that others reported it is treated as evidence. Coverage framed as controversy or debunking still completes the trade, because it brings the claim to a larger audience and lends it the reputable outlet's name. The trade also runs upward into officialdom when politicians repeat a claim after reading it in the press.

Real-world examples

  • Pizzagate moved in weeks in 2016 from Reddit and 4chan threads to YouTube, to Infowars, and into mainstream coverage of the phenomenon; a man who fired a rifle inside the restaurant in December 2016 said he had come to investigate.
  • The 2016 Lisa case in Germany began with a Russian state television report that a Russian-German girl had been abducted and raped by migrants, which was amplified by diaspora groups and then raised by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, although Berlin police had established the story was false.
  • In May 2018, a misreading of a Senate testimony spread among left-leaning accounts as the claim that the government had lost 1,475 migrant children; it traded up through op-eds and politicians' statements before fact-checkers clarified that the figure referred to sponsors who did not answer follow-up calls, and that the children were not in federal custody.
  • Holiday recounts manufacturing controversies for American Apparel and author Tucker Max — vandalizing his own client's billboards, tipping off blogs, and watching the outrage reach national outlets.

Ethical guidelines

  • Citing a lower outlet's coverage as evidence a claim is newsworthy, when you could not verify the claim yourself, transfers your credibility to material you have not checked.
  • Reporting on a rumor as a controversy is a publishing decision that benefits its originator; the question is whether the public needs it, not whether it is trending.
  • PR practitioners who seed stories they know to be misleading are engaged in deception whatever the client or cause.

How to defend against it

  • Follow the citations downward: click through each according to and as reported by until you reach the original source, and judge the claim by that source alone.
  • Distinguish coverage of a claim from confirmation of it — a reputable outlet writing that people are saying X has not verified X.
  • Search the claim with a date filter to see where and when it first appeared; a chain that starts in an anonymous forum has never been verified no matter how many outlets repeated it.
  • Ask who placed the story: a publicist, campaign, or foreign broadcaster at the bottom of the chain tells you more than the masthead at the top.
  • When correcting a laundered claim, lead with the fact and name the origin (fact-myth-fallacy-fact, Debunking Handbook 2020) rather than repeating the headline.

From the Defense Playbook

Every playbook entry states how strong its evidence is and when not to use it. Browse the full playbook.

References

  1. Holiday, R. (2012). Trust Me, I'm Lying: Confessions of a Media Manipulator. Portfolio / Penguin
    First-person account of trading stories up from blogs to national outlets for commercial clients.
  2. Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. Data & Society Research Institute · link
    How online subcultures trade stories up through partisan media into mainstream coverage.
  3. Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Ecker, U. K. H., et al. (2020). The Debunking Handbook 2020. Databrary / Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University
    The fact-myth-fallacy-fact structure recommended for correcting laundered claims.
Last reviewed
Suggest a correction

Detect Trading Up the Chain in any text

Paste any message, email, or article into our free Manipulation Detector to see if Trading Up the Chain or other techniques are being used on you.

Related Articles