PoliticalMANIPULATIVE

Transfer

What it is

Associating a person, product, or idea with something the audience already respects or reveres — transferring the positive (or negative) feelings.

How it works

By placing a product next to a flag, a candidate next to a church, or an idea next to a respected figure, the positive associations transfer without any logical connection being made. The audience's existing feelings about the symbol, institution, or person are borrowed by proximity. This works in reverse too — associating an opponent with reviled symbols to transfer negative feelings.

Real-world examples

  • •1984: Ronald Reagan's Morning in America surrounded the candidate with flags, weddings, and farms; 2008: Barack Obama's Yes We Can iconography and the Shepard Fairey Hope poster borrowed civil-rights and New Deal visual language.
  • •Uniforms and pulpits: candidates of both parties film in churches and with veterans; George W. Bush's 2003 Mission Accomplished carrier landing and John Kerry's 2004 convention salute (reporting for duty) are the same move.
  • •Nazi propaganda appropriated Norse runes and Roman iconography; Soviet posters borrowed the composition of Orthodox icons for Lenin.
  • •Advertising: the Marlboro Man (1954 to 1999) transferred the cowboy's independence to a cigarette; Coca-Cola's Santa Claus campaigns (from 1931) transferred Christmas warmth to a soft drink.
  • •Negative transfer: edited images placing an opponent beside a dictator or a reviled figure, used against candidates of every party in the social-media era.

Ethical guidelines

  • ●Transfer exploits emotional associations rather than building genuine connections.
  • ●Borrowing the credibility of institutions without their endorsement is deceptive.
  • ●Negative transfer — associating opponents with evil — is particularly destructive to democratic discourse.

How to defend against it

  • ►When you see something associated with a respected symbol, ask: "Is there an actual connection, or just a visual juxtaposition?"
  • ►Evaluate people and ideas on their own merits, not on the company they keep in photographs.
  • ►Recognize that staging associations is easy and proves nothing.

From the Defense Playbook

Name the Missing Premiseminutes

Most everyday arguments leave out the premise that does the real work; find it by asking what would have to be true for the stated reason to support the conclusion, say it aloud, and see whether anyone is still willing to assert it.

Every playbook entry states how strong its evidence is and when not to use it. Browse the full playbook.

References

  1. Lee, A. M., & Lee, E. B. (Eds.), for the Institute for Propaganda Analysis (1939). The Fine Art of Propaganda: A Study of Father Coughlin's Speeches. Harcourt, Brace and Company
    Origin of 'transfer' as one of the seven propaganda devices: carrying the authority, sanction and prestige of something respected (a flag, a church, a revered figure) over to something the propagandist wants accepted, or the reverse for something to be rejected.
  2. Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421
    The mechanism the entry claims — feelings transfer by mere pairing without any logical connection: evaluative conditioning (a neutral stimulus acquires the valence of a liked or disliked stimulus it is paired with) is a reliable effect across 214 studies, though effect sizes vary with awareness of the pairing.
Last reviewed
Suggest a correction

Detect Transfer in any text

Paste any message, email, or article into our free Manipulation Detector to see if Transfer or other techniques are being used on you.

Try the Detector FreeCreate Free Account