Political
Manufactured Consent
What it is
Chomsky and Herman's model describing how mass media systematically creates public support for elite interests through five filters: ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, and ideology.
How it works
Real-world examples
- •Media coverage of foreign policy consistently aligning with government narratives despite contradictory evidence.
- •Corporate media framing labor disputes from management perspective due to advertiser relationships.
- •Think tank experts with undisclosed industry funding presented as neutral analysts on news programs.
Ethical guidelines
- ●This technique is inherently deceptive as it disguises elite interests as public consensus.
- ●Media organizations should disclose ownership, funding, and potential conflicts of interest.
- ●Democratic societies require genuinely diverse media ecosystems.
How to defend against it
- ►Diversify your news sources across ownership structures — include independent, nonprofit, and international outlets.
- ►Ask who owns the outlet, who advertises there, and whose sources they rely on.
- ►Look for stories that are underreported relative to their importance.
References
- Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (2nd ed.). Pantheon BooksOriginal formulation of the propaganda model with five filters (ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, ideology). The 2002 edition adds a reflective preface addressing the model's reception.
- Mullen, A., & Klaehn, J. (2010). The Herman-Chomsky propaganda model: A critical approach to analysing mass media behaviour. Sociology Compass, 4(4), 215–229 · linkContemporary academic review of the propaganda model, including subsequent empirical tests and applications to digital media.
Last reviewed
Suggest a correction