Psychological
Pygmalion Effect
What it is
Using high expectations to improve someone's performance — or low expectations to diminish it.
How it works
Real-world examples
- •Teachers told that certain students are "gifted" (actually chosen at random) unconsciously give those students more attention, and the students outperform peers.
- •Managers who label an employee as "high potential" invest more in their development, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.
- •A coach who benches a player and communicates low expectations, leading to a performance decline that "justifies" the decision.
Ethical guidelines
- ●Hold high expectations for everyone, not just those you favor.
- ●Be aware that your expectations shape others' reality, especially for those in your care.
- ●Do not use low expectations to justify neglect or discrimination.
How to defend against it
- ►Recognize when someone's low expectations of you are affecting your self-belief.
- ►Seek feedback from multiple sources, not just one authority figure.
- ►Define your own standards of performance rather than internalizing others' labels.
References
- Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils' Intellectual Development. Holt, Rinehart & WinstonFoundational field study: teachers told certain (randomly selected) students were "gifted" produced measurable IQ gains in those students compared to controls.
- Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131–155 · linkContemporary meta-analytic review of expectation effects; effect sizes are real but smaller and more context-dependent than the original study suggested.
Last reviewed
Suggest a correction