Psychological
Nudge Theory
What it is
Subtly guiding decisions by shaping the environment in which choices are made, without restricting options.
How it works
Real-world examples
- •Placing healthy food at eye level in a cafeteria to increase consumption without banning junk food.
- •Automatically enrolling employees in retirement savings plans with an opt-out rather than opt-in.
- •Putting a fly sticker in a urinal to reduce spillage by giving people something to aim at.
Ethical guidelines
- ●Nudges should align with the interests of the person being nudged, not just the nudger.
- ●Maintain transparency — people should be able to learn about nudges affecting them.
- ●Preserve genuine freedom of choice; a nudge that effectively eliminates alternatives is coercion.
How to defend against it
- ►Be aware that the way choices are presented influences your decision — ask what the alternatives are.
- ►Question defaults: just because something is pre-selected does not mean it is the best option for you.
- ►Actively seek out the option that was made harder to find, not just the easiest one.
References
- Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University PressOriginal formulation of libertarian paternalism and the nudge concept; framework for using choice architecture to influence decisions while preserving autonomy.
- Sunstein, C. R. (2015). The ethics of nudging. Yale Journal on Regulation, 32(2), 413–450 · linkComprehensive treatment of ethical constraints on nudging, including the line between welfare-preserving nudges and manipulation.
Last reviewed
Suggest a correction