Linguistic

Red Herring

What it is

Introducing an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the main issue.

How it works

By shifting the conversation to a tangentially related or completely unrelated subject, the persuader prevents scrutiny of the original point. The audience follows the new thread and the original issue goes unaddressed.

Real-world examples

  • A politician answering a question about policy with a personal anecdote.
  • A defendant bringing up the victim's character to avoid the charges.
  • Responding to budget criticism by talking about a competitor's problems.

Ethical guidelines

  • Stay on topic and address questions directly.
  • If changing subjects, acknowledge you are doing so and why.
  • Do not deliberately distract from valid criticism.

How to defend against it

  • Notice when the conversation has drifted from the original question.
  • Politely redirect: "That's interesting, but let's get back to the original point."
  • Write down the original question so it cannot be forgotten.

References

  1. Aristotle (-350). Sophistical Refutations (De Sophisticis Elenchis). Trans. W. A. Pickard-Cambridge. In The Complete Works of Aristotle (Barnes, ed., 1984) · link
    Classical enumeration of relevance fallacies; the ignoratio elenchi ancestor of the modern "red herring."
  2. Walton, D. (2004). Relevance in Argumentation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
    Modern argumentation-theoretic treatment of relevance and irrelevance in dialogue, including the red-herring pattern.
Last reviewed
Suggest a correction

Detect Red Herring in any text

Paste any message, email, or article into our free Manipulation Detector to see if Red Herring or other techniques are being used on you.

Related Articles